By Karl Pomeroy
April 19, 2020
Updated April 20, 2020
Someone has succeeded in taking over the world. We don’t know who. It could be an underground society hiding in plain sight. Secret clubs like Skull & Bones or The Masons are long rumored to have such ambitions. Surely there are others with similar megalomaniac goals—gangs of ravenous power-seeking thugs even smarter and more clandestine.
Who masterminded 9/11? Who masterminded chemtrails? We still don’t know. The culprits are clever, whoever they are. And the Covid-19 crisis is such a brilliant prank, the masterminds must be masters of psychological manipulation.
After all, look at what they’ve accomplished. They have managed to lock down most of the world’s citizens without even firing a shot, without so much as revealing a hint of their identity or purpose. They wield command over the heads of state of nearly every nation on the globe, as well as many governors in the United States. They control the CDC, the WHO, and the Chinese communist regime.
Are these elite thugs the invisible enemy Trump often tweets about?
The video below offers a startling hyposthesis as to the identity of the Covid pranksters. But first—their manifesto. Entitled Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development, this declaration of world conquest was published by the Rockefeller Foundation in 2010. The 54-page pdf document outlines plans for global control, eerily describing just what we’re starting to see—a worldwide pandemic, global economic collapse, civil unrest and eventual chaos, to be followed by global totalitarian rule. [Excerpts from the Rockefeller document are shown under the video. The full document is available here.]
Good luck with that
The Rockefeller “Manifesto” lays out a scheme for global conquest, culminating in a one-world authoritarian dictatorship. But like all megalomaniacs, these privileged psychopaths underestimate the intelligence of others. Only now are people waking up. Yet already they are showing signs of deeper insight and analysis, puzzling out the COVID hoax with all its contradictions. And since the capacity of mind is limitless, especially when compelled by necessity, these insights will lead to tricks and traps that will inevitably foil the takeover.
Humanity will soon transcend this vapid and transparent prank, no doubt to the mortal detriment of its makers, as history shows. We will face this like Churchill faced Hitler.
What kind of a people do they think we are?
Video and document excerpts
The following video by Dana Ashlie, entitled What in the world is actually going on? Document reveals plans, step by step, outlines the key points in the Rockefeller Foundation document, paralleling their intentions with events now unfolding.
This video was posted at the State of the Nation website.
Below is an excerpt also discussed in the video (Scenario Narratives – Lockstep, p18). It lays out the pandemic scenario as envisioned by the Rockefeller Foundation in 2010. The narrative is set in 2012, but told in the past tense like a story. Though wrong in a few details, it bears a stunning resemblance to the COVID-19 pandemic now taking place, which points to complicity as well as uncanny power. Read on:
Rockefeller Foundation (2010): “In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been anticipating for years finally hit. Unlike 2009’s H1N1, this new influenza strain — originating from wild geese — was extremely virulent and deadly. Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months, the majority of them healthy young adults. The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers.
“The pandemic blanketed the planet — though disproportionate numbers died in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Central America, where the virus spread like wildfire in the absence of official containment protocols. But even in developed countries, containment was a challenge. The United States’s initial policy of “strongly discouraging” citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but across borders. However, a few countries did fare better — China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter postpandemic recovery.
“China’s government was not the only one that took extreme measures to protect its citizens from risk and exposure. During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems — from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty — leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power….”
End excerpt. [Excerpt continues at the bottom of this post.]
The State of the Nation website is an internet leader in research on the globalist cabal. I present below one of their articles as an example of deepening insight. Following that is an uplifting piece by analyst , offering ideas on transcending the Covid hoax challenge.
OPERATION COVID-19: The Final Battle of the War on Consciousness
By State of the Nation
State of the Nation
April 17, 2020
What else can be said about the unparalleled war raging across planet Earth in 2020. Never have the forces of light and the forces of darkness been locked in such a fierce and epoch-ending battle. The forces of light — EVERYWHERE — are under withering attack by the forces of darkness. However, the forces of darkness are experiencing an incessant barrage of assaults by means of the most powerful weapon in the universe—TRUTH!
The true depth and breadth of this biblical war are far too great to explain in this short post. Suffice it to say that every human being is now situated on the battlefield of their own making. That’s also called destiny which is determined by each person’s own unique karma.
Really, is there any place on planet Earth that is not a perilous battleground today? Clearly, this “Final Battle” of the Third Millennium has been pre-planned with extraordinary intentional design.
However, that “extraordinary intentional design” is not exactly what the vast majority of conspiracy realists think.
Virtually every COVID-19 truth seeker, pandemic researcher, medical investigator, armchair sleuth, geopolitical analyst, conspiracy theorist, etc. firmly believes that the dark side is totally responsible for this “Greatest Show on Earth”.
They are also aware that the directors and producers, screenwriters and cinematographers, reality stars and crisis actors of this global melodrama come from the ranks of the forces of darkness. On a certain level, they’re absolutely right.
After all, who else could have funded and financed such a complex and massive theatrical undertaking as OPERATION COVID-19 except the . . . READ MORE AT SOTN>> [substantial analysis at source]
The Implosion of the ‘Coronavirus’ Hysteria Smells A lot Like 1989…
By Bretigne Shaffer
Ron Paul Institute
April 17, 2020
The weeks’ long coronavirus lockdown is being exposed as, at best, a wild over-reaction. Americans are starting to protest the destruction of their economy, the loss of their jobs, and the attacks on their basic Constitutional rights. The walls of oppression built by the petty tyrants throughout the country are beginning to crack. It reminds me of the feeling that was in the air in that memorable year 1989, when the world as we knew it was turned upside down.
What was so significant about 1989 and why do I suddenly get that feeling in the air again? For me, it was two things: 1) The Tiananmen demonstrations – I was in Hong Kong during this period (I actually arrived I think a day before the death of Hu Yaobang, which is what started them), and 2) the fall of the Berlin Wall, and the events that led up to it.
What it smelled like was this:
All of a sudden, anything at all was possible. All of a sudden, people realized that the chains that bound them weren’t as real as they had always believed them to be. Of course, in China, as exhilarating as the demonstrations were, it did not end well. But for Eastern Europe, it was very different.
I remember seeing the images of the picnickers (and others) from Hungary hopping the fences into Austria. Just hopping what looked like two-foot high little wire fences. Like that was the only thing that had ever been holding them in. To me, those were the most moving images of all: People realizing that they were free.
By the time they started hammering away at the Berlin Wall, everything had already happened. It seemed like just the tearing down of a symbol at that point. I had visited Berlin, five years earlier, and I remember people telling me it would never come down. Everyone hated it, everyone wanted it down, but nobody knew how to do it, and there seemed to be a widespread acceptance that there was nothing they could do about it.
Until there was.
That’s what this feels like now. The governments’ over-the-top response has pushed people too far. Which I imagine they anticipated, but I also imagine that they believed that would result in riots and violent protest (which it will, once people can’t put food on their tables – but we’re not there yet.) But instead of rioting in the streets, people are engaged in peaceful protests, and more importantly, they are starting to simply defy the orders. Businesses, churches, and even some schools, are starting to open up again, in blatant disregard for the orders they have been given. They are ignoring the state.
There is more of this coming. And the more people who do it, the more are emboldened to. I don’t know what goes on inside the minds of the people who want to rule the world, but I can only imagine that they believe that people will always be easily manipulated by fear. It’s true that people are far too easily manipulated by fear, but the capacity to do that is not infinite, and I think those who are using it have overplayed their hand this time.
Because what I’m seeing now is not people driven by fear. There was a lot of fear when this first started – but I think a lot of people are coming out of that now. I think a great many are realizing that the costs of the shutdowns are going to be much, much worse than the impact of the virus, and I also see a lot of people recognizing that individuals should decide for themselves what risks they are comfortable with. I’m seeing a lot of pushback against authoritarianism, and it’s not coming from fear, but something else. I don’t think the people who engineered this anticipated that something else.
Yes, there are still the people buying into the fear, ratting out their neighbors, etc. But I’m seeing a lot more of the opposite: People recognizing who the enemy is here, and that it is not their neighbors. I’m seeing small business owners having the courage to re-open their businesses against government orders, at the risk of losing their licenses and, here in LA, their power and water supply. And I see a huge number of people ready to support them. People are planning more peaceful protests, and more and more businesses are planning to open up. They’re saying (here in CA) “they can’t arrest all of us.” What I see is that people are starting to realize that their chains aren’t as real as they thought they were.
That’s what 1989 smelled like.
EXCERPTS from Rockefeller document, continued:
[Cont. from p19]: “At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty — and their privacy — to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests. In many developed countries, enforced cooperation with a suite of new regulations and agreements slowly but steadily restored both order and, importantly, economic growth. …”
“Across the developing world, however, thestory was different — and much more variable. Top-down authority took different forms in different countries, hinging largely on the capacity, caliber, and intentions of their leaders. In countries with strong and thoughtful leaders, citizens’ overall economic status and quality of life increased. … But more authoritarian leadership worked less well — and in some cases tragically — in countries run by irresponsible elites who used their increased power to pursue their own interests at the expense of their citizens.
“There were other downsides, as the rise of virulent nationalism created new hazards: spectators at the 2018 World Cup, for example, wore bulletproof vests that sported a patch of their national flag. …
“Meanwhile, in the developed world, the presence of so many top-down rules and norms greatly inhibited entrepreneurial activity. Scientists and innovators were often told by governments what research lines to pursue and were guided mostly toward projects that would make money (e.g., market-driven product development) or were “sure bets” (e.g., fundamental research), leaving more risky or innovative research areas largely untapped. Well-off countries and monopolistic companies with big research and development budgets still made significant advances, but the IP behind their breakthroughs remained locked behind strict national or corporate protection. …
“By 2025, people seemed to be growing weary of so much top-down control and letting leaders and authorities make choices for them. Wherever national interests clashed with individual interests, there was conflict. Sporadic pushback became increasingly organized and coordinated, as disaffected youth and people who had seen their status and opportunities slip away — largely in developing countries — incited civil unrest. … Even those who liked the greater stability and predictability of this world began to grow uncomfortable and constrained by so many tight rules and by the strictness of national boundaries. The feeling lingered that sooner or later, something would inevitably upset the neat order that the world’s governments had worked so hard to establish.”