The IFit Zone
Posted Quemado Institute
April 28, 2019
If you’ve noticed new cell phone tower construction in your area, you are not alone. Currently, about 154,000 cell towers exist in the United States. But telecommunications companies are set to expand their networks, adding about 800,000 new towers by 2026, to meet the growing demand for 5G technology.
Currently, cell phones use a higher-frequency microwave in order to connect to the internet. Some studies have already linked this type cell phone radiation to cancers of the heart and reproductive organs, among others. Meanwhile, 5G technology employs lower-frequency waves, called millimeter waves (MMW) to access the internet at much higher speeds. But in the case of these MMWs, virtually no research exists to prove their safety.
Since MMWs are capable of traveling a much shorter distance than microwaves, and cannot transmit through many types of materials, a higher density of towers will be needed to support 5G technology. Hence, the 800,000 towers that will be added in order to support about 100 million wireless devices.
This might sound like good news if you’re excited about faster internet, but the trade-off could be your health. With 5G towers on virtually every corner, we will all face higher radiation exposure than ever before. And many experts warn that without proper data on the effects, “the deployment of 5G, or fifth generation cellular technology, constitutes a massive experiment on the health of all species” (Dr Joel Moskowitz, public health professor at the University of California, Berkeley).
The main concern lies in absorption. While MMWs seem incapable of penetrating some materials, they are indeed absorbed by the skin. Dr Moskowitz explains, “since skin contains capillaries and nerve endings, MMW bio-effects may be transmitted through molecular mechanisms by the skin or through the nervous system.” He has also expressed concern that MMWs will affect the eyes, peripheral nervous system, testes, and sweat glands.
Moskowitz is not alone: The International Society of Doctors for the Environment, made up of more than 200 doctors and scientists, has released statements calling for a halt to 5G technology expansion, at least until safety testing has been thoroughly conducted. So far, both Verizon and AT&T have continued with their plans for the new towers in 11 cities, including Atlanta, Georgia and Dallas, Texas.
So, is 5G a mass public health experiment? Yes, in the sense that we won’t know the health effects of widespread exposure until we’re already exposed. Let’s all hope that effects are minimal to none. But in the meantime, give us a call to explore your options for protecting yourself and your family. A special chip, when installed on your phone and other wireless devices, can neutralize wireless radiation. As the old saying goes, an ounce of prevention could be worth a pound of cure. It could be decades before we fully understand the health consequences of widespread 5G technology.
Last week, U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal grilled wireless industry representatives, who admitted the industry has done ZERO health & safety studies on 5G technology. Meanwhile, dozens of independent studies indicates that 5G is a risk to all biological life. Watch the video above, on YouTube here, or on Facebook here
WASHINGTON, DC / During today’s Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee hearing on the future of 5G wireless technology and their impact on the American people and economy, U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) raised concerns with the lack of any scientific research and data on the technology’s potential health risks.
Blumenthal blasted the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)—government agencies jointly-responsible for ensuring that cellphone technologies are safe to use—for failing to conduct any research into the safety of 5G technology, and instead, engaging in bureaucratic finger-pointing and deferring to industry.
In December 2018, Blumenthal and U.S. Representative Anna G. Eshoo (CA-18) sent a letter to FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr seeking answers regarding potential health risks posed by new 5G wireless technology. At today’s hearing, Blumenthal criticized Carr for failing to provide answers, and instead, just echoing, “the general statements of the FDA, which shares regulatory responsibility for cell phones with the FCC.” Blumenthal also decried the FDA’s statements as “pretty unsatisfactory.” A PDF of Carr’s complete response is available here.
During an exchange with wireless industry representatives, Blumenthal asked them whether they have supported research on the safety of 5G technology and potential links between radiofrequency and cancer, and the industry representatives conceded they have not. . . . READ MORE AT STATE OF THE NATION>>
Citizens Up in Arms Against 5G Wireless Technology Roll-Out: Are Their Concerns Justified?
By: Lloyd Burrell
State of the Nation
April 28, 2019
City council chambers and local officials in the US are facing the outcry of residents frightened by the next generation 5G wireless communications which by all accounts, will be taking over neighborhoods soon. A resident in Montgomery County, Maryland raised her voice to ask local officials “Why can’t we do a real health assessment here and find out what the real health risks are — to our children?” at a public meeting held at the county . What are the risks? More to the point what is 5G?
What is 5G? The 5th generation wireless systems (5G) are new network technologies designed to make your cell phone and similar wireless devices become super-duper powerful and fast. Scheduled to be deployed from 2018 and made commercially available in 2020  we are told 5G is expected to support at least 100 billion devices and up to 100 times faster than current 4G technology. (4G is already about 10 times faster than 3G). The 5G tech will employ low-(0.6 GHz – 3.7 GHz), mid-(3.7 – 24 GHz), and high-band frequencies (24 GHz and higher). The “high-band” frequencies largely consist of millimeter waves (MMWs), a type of electromagnetic radiation with wavelengths within 1- 10 millimeters and frequencies ranging from 30 to 300 GHz.
Health Hazards from Cell Phone Technology “Beyond Measure”: Cell phones operate essentially by sending and receiving radiofrequency radiation from their antennas to a nearby cell tower. Thousands of independent studies link Radiofrequency radiation exposures from cell phones to a number of very serious diseases such as; Cancer , Infertility , Cardiovascular Diseases , Birth defects , Memory Problems , Sleep Disorders  and so on.
5G Technology Comes With Increased RF Radiation Exposure: These millimeter waves (MMWs) as used by the 5G network can transmit large amounts of data within a short period of time. But over short distances and also, the other big issue is that the signal is poorly transmitted through solid materials. This means massive transmission of MMW will be needed. Many new antennas will be needed. We are told full-scale implementation may require at least one antenna for every 10 to 12 houses in urban. . . READ MORE AT STATE OF THE NATION>>
Dear State Official,
Arizona prides itself on being one of the freest states of the nation. We Arizonans make our own decisions. And we take our interests seriously.
Our uniquely scenic state need not comply with the FCC directive to build out Fifth Generation (5G) communications infrastructure. We can refuse, and thereby join the burgeoning political and legal opposition to the unconstitutional 5G mandate.
Fifth generation cell technology—designed to multiply many times over the frequency and intensity of background RF microwave radiation—poses unprecedented health dangers documented in thousands of scientific studies. Causing a wide range of illnesses from cancer to cerebral edema, this radical technology could easily kill you, your children, your grandchildren, your extended family, pets, friends and loved-ones.
And 5G is not just a danger to health. It is fast becoming a political hot potato:
along with new examples every day of cascading civil and official resistance.
Let Arizona stand proud in opposing this hazardous technology, just as we stand proud against uncontrolled illegal migration.
Step up and oppose 5G! Keep Arizona safe for future generations.
Arizona Residents Against 5G
5G NIMBIES Go Ballistic
State of the Nation
Submitted by Concerned Citizens Against 5G
April 14, 2019
We will do whatever it takes to irreparably neutralize 5G infrastructure! 5G will not be allowed in our neighborhoods.— Anti-5G Protestor
The burgeoning citizens movement to stop the 5G roll-out is taking a page right out of the French Yellow Vest’s playbook. Some of these folks are fierce and furious and ferocious. They will do ANYTHING to stop 5G. And they come from all walks of life. What they share is an unshakable conviction about the extraordinary dangers of 5G technology. They also all agree that the government has let them down in a big way. These American “Yellow Vests” firmly believe government at all levels are conspiring with the Telcom companies to roll-out 5G without informed consent. They also know that zero testing of 5G on human health and safety has been conducted as required by law. Because of this unacceptable predicament, anonymous “Yellow Vests” throughout the USA have announced they will be taking aggressive measures to thwart the 5G deployment. Cellphone towers have already been disabled in targeted areas. These incidents have not been reported by the media for fear of copycats rapidly multiplying. However, there’s no stopping this angry movement from growing. Their goal is to inspire every community to target the local 5G infrastructure by whatever . . . READ MORE AT STATE OF THE NATION>>
A full length documentary by Sacha Stone exposing the 5G existential threat to humanity in a way we never imagined possible! Featured in this film: weapons development experts, biologists, molecular & cellular biologists, blood microscopists, activists, as well as good leaders out there on the frontline.
This video is a must see for every living human being.
“The most urgent issue facing man today is the imminent onslaught of 5G technology. The human race and all living species are soon to be inundated with powerful high frequency RF and microwave radiation at every location on the planet. This savage attack on the very structure of our DNA and cellular physiology by the New World Order globalists and tech-giant corporations will begin in 2020 with the full roll-out of Fifth Generation satellite and earth-based telecommunications infrastructure.” –Karl Pomeroy, Chief Editor, Quemado Institute
See State of the Nation:
5G GENOCIDE: The Most Lethal NWO Conspiracy of the Third Millennium
By Philip M. Giraldi
Strategic Culture Foundation
March 23, 2019
Posted Quemado Institute
March 24, 2019
There is a saying attributed to the French banker Nathan Rothschild that “Give me control of a nation’s money and I care not who makes its laws.” Conservative opinion in the United States has long suspected that Rothschild was right and there have been frequent calls to audit the Federal Reserve Bank based on the presumption that it has not always acted in support of the actual interests of the American people. That such an assessment is almost certainly correct might be presumed based on the 2008 economic crash in which the government bailed out the banks, which had through their malfeasance caused the disaster, and left individual Americans who had lost everything to face the consequences.
Be that as it may, if there were a modern version of the Rothschild comment it might go something like this: “Give me control of the internet and no one will ever more know what is true.” The internet, which was originally conceived of as a platform for the free interchange of information and opinions, is instead inexorably becoming a managed medium that is increasingly controlled by corporate and government interests. Those interests are in no way answerable to the vast majority of the consumers who actually use the sites in a reasonable and non-threatening fashion to communicate and share different points of view.
The United States Congress started the regulation ball rolling when it summoned the chief executives of the leading social media sites in the wake of the 2016 election. It sought explanations regarding why and how the Russians had allegedly been able to interfere in the election through the use of fraudulent accounts to spread information that might have influenced some voters. In spite of the sound and fury, however, all Congress succeeded in doing was . . . READ MORE AT SCF>>
Climate Engineering Winter Weather Warfare
By Dane Wigington – Published February 15, 2019
Click for video.
Erratic and unprecedented weather is radically increasing all over the world. Though there are countless forms of human activity affecting the equation, the global climate engineering assault is by far the single greatest and most destructive factor. The geoengineers are manufacturing winter weather scenarios on a scale that can scarcely be comprehended, what will it take to wake populations to this fact? This short video report covers the latest engineered winter weather event to impact California. — Dane Wigington Geoengineeringwatch.org
By Dane Wigington, GeoengineeringWatch.org
Click for VIDEO.
Climate engineering and weather warfare are ultimately one in the same. The ongoing atmospheric experiments taking place in our skies have a long history with many objectives and agendas being carried out, the equation is complex. If we are to have any chance of exposing and halting catastrophic global climate engineering operations, we must first have a clear understanding of the issue itself. This video is by far the most complete and comprehensive presentation ever produced by GeoengineeringWatch.org. The presentation was given live at Northern California public awareness raising event. It is our hope that this video will provide a useful tool for increasing desperately needed public awareness and understanding of the critically important climate engineering issue. It is imperative to reach a critical mass of public awareness as quickly as possible. The effort to expose and halt geoengineering operations can only be waged with an awakened population, time is not on our side. Sharing credible data from a credible source is the most effective and efficient way to wake others who are not yet aware of the issue. Make your voice heard, make every day count. —Dane Wigington
By Elizabeth Vos
August 15, 2018
Posted Quemado Institute
August 17, 2018
One of the key concerns raised by the recent censorship of Infowars and Telesur is that, although the two outlets could not be more different politically and structurally, both were providing fair coverage of, or support to politically imprisoned and now totally isolated journalist Julian Assange. Since Assange was silenced in late March, his supporters continuously warned that if he were to remain unable to connect with the outside world, it would result in the silencing of the rest of us. They warned repeatedly and loudly that Assange was the last buffer between the establishment’s ire and total domination of social discourse, a canary in the coal mine of state censorship. Unfortunately, we now see that those concerns were well-founded. The unelected Western power structure and its technocratic social-media-baron proxies coordinated the recent purge of Alex Jones’s Infowars within twelve hours on the same day, then deleted the Facebook page of Telesur, a Venezuelan news network, multiple times. While Venezuelan news network Telesur had covered Assange for years, Infowars recently published a petition in support of the WikiLeaks co-founder. That Infowars and Telesur are vastly different goes without saying. However, it bears repeating that the significant bridge joining these two entities is . . . READ MORE AT DISOBEDIENT MEDIA>>
Julian Assange has remained incommunicado for more than six weeks and as his health deteriorates many of his former supporters have remained silent too, says James Cogan.
Ecuador Hints It May Hand Over Assange
By James Cogan
May 14, 2018
Julian Assange is in immense danger. Remarks made this week by Ecuador’s foreign minister suggest that her government may be preparing to renege on the political asylum it granted to the WikiLeaks editor in 2012 and hand him over to British and then American authorities.
On March 28, under immense pressure from the British and U.S. governments, Ecuador imposed a complete ban on Assange having any Internet or phone contact with the outside world, and blocked his friends and supporters from physically visiting him.
For 46 days, he has not been heard from.
Ecuadorian Foreign Minister Maria Fernanda Espinosa stated in a Spanish-language interview on Wednesday that her government and Britain “have the intention and the interest that this be resolved.” Moves were underway, she said, to reach a “definite agreement” on Assange.
If Assange falls into the hands of the British state, he faces being turned over to the U.S. Last year, U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions stated that putting Assange on trial for espionage was a “priority.” CIA director Mike Pompeo, now secretary of state, asserted that WikiLeaks was a “non-state hostile intelligence service.”
In 2010, WikiLeaks courageously published information leaked . . . READ MORE AT CONSORTIUM NEWS>> [Substantial analysis at source.]
February 2, 2018
The Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II which is a single-seat, single-engine, all-weather stealth multirole fighters is UNDERGOING FINAL DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING by the United States. The pentagon began the F 35 program in 2001 with an aim to develop a cost effective replacement for the u.s. military’s f-15 fighters, f-16 and f-18 bombers and reconnaissance aircraft, and a-10 close air support warplanes. Apart from United States,the primary customer and financial backer, the United Kingdom, Italy, the Netherlands, Canada, Turkey, Australia, Norway and Denmark are also part of the program. Many other nations like Japan and Israel are also deploying the fighters. The nine major partner nations, including the U.S, plan to acquire over 3,000 F-35s through 2035, which, if delivered will make the F-35 one of the most numerous jet fighters. The fighter aircraft will be in service till 2050.
On 2 August 2016, the U.S. Air Force declared its first squadron of F-35A fighters combat-ready. S 400 Triumph is an anti-aircraft weapon system developed by Russia’s Almaz Central Design bureau in the 1990s as an upgrade of the s-300 family. it has been in service with the Russian armed forces since 2007. It is designed to defend against aircrafts including 5th generation stealth fighters ,bombers, awacs, cruise missiles and ballistic missile. It is considered one of the most power anti aircraft defense system in the world.
In this video Defense Updates analyze the outcome when F 35 is pitted against S 400. OPTIONS in a combat environment: F 35 has the following options to defeat S 400. 1. OUT RUN 2. OUT MANEUVER A MISSILE 3. STEALTH TO AVOID DETECTION 4. USE EW SUIT TO JAM S 400 5. LONG RANGE PREEMPTIVE STANDOFF STRIKE We will analyze each of these one by one and rate the chances F 35 against S 400 on a scale of 1 to 5.
OUT RUN – But in case of F 35, the tactics will be useless since it has a top speed of only 1.6 mach and missiles deployed by s 400 have hypersonic speeds ranging from 6 Mach to 14 Mach. For example, 40N6 missile has a speed of 14 Mach.
OUT MANEUVER – F 35 is not designed to be a great dogfighter and lacks agility when compared to fighters like F 22 or SU 35. The need for the small F 35 to carry a heavy range of internal engines, fuel and weapons has resulted in what aviation experts labels a ‘high wing loading’. essentially, the wings are small in relation to its weight and this impedes maneuverability. F 35 also has a sluggish rate of climb when compared to modern fighters.
STEALTH – The trump card of F 35 against any air defense system is that , it is a stealthy aircraft. But F 35’s simplified airframe is far less of the ‘shaped stealth’ found in the F 22. This implies a much greater reliance on radar-absorbing materials. * Against x-band radars, it is only stealthy (lo) from front and rear; * Against s-band radar, it is stealthy from narrow front aspect, * Against l-band radar. limited reduction is achieved from direct front The nabob svn & zebu m have a claimed capability against stealth aircraft. Keeping in view the different aspects, F 35 will be vulnerable in a combat scenario.
EM SUIT – All three variants of the F 35 carry Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radars with sophisticated electronic attack capabilities, including false targets, network attack, advanced jamming and algorithm-packed data streams. This system allows the F 35 to reach well-defended targets and suppress enemy radars that threaten the F 35.
LONG RANGE PREEMPTIVE STANDOFF STRIKE – S 400 is designed to be mobile. All system components are carried by self-propelled wheeled all-terrain chassis. Even if detected, S 400 will be a very very tough nut to crack. Just one S 400 system can control up to 72 launchers, with a maximum of 384 missiles. This means that system has enough ammunition & targeting strength to take down a saturation attack.Also an important aspect is that for aerodynamic target and ballistic targets, the minimum engagement range is only 2 and 5 km respectively . A separate independent air defense system 42S6 Morfey , is being developed by Russia’s Almaz-Antey corporation. This system is designated as short-range air defense system, and will protect the s-400 from various threats at their terminal phases.
CONCLUSION As per our analysis, F 35 will find it difficult to operate in areas protected by S 400. This means the not only us but the partner nations will find it hard to gain air supremacy, which is vital in modern conflicts.
VIDEO by TheHealthRanger – Natural News – October 9, 2017
Republished at Paul Craig Roberts Official Website
Click for VIDEO
In essence, because of the differences in the speed of sound vs. the speed of the bullets from a known cartridge (.223 Remington, in this case), the time lag between the last bullet hitting the pavement and the last audible report of the rifle muzzle can be used to very accurately calculate the range of the shooter.
More importantly, when the audio from the Las Vegas shooting is analyzed, it reveals TWO shooters operating at the same time, not just one shooter. Shooter #1 is operating at 425 – 475 yards, which is consistent with the Mandalay Bay hotel, but shooter #2 is operating at approximately 250 – 270 yards.
For more analysis on Las Vegas shooting, see Carnicom Institute:
By Mike Adams
October 2, 2017
What we know for sure is that, yes, 59 people were killed (so far) and hundreds were wounded. This wasn’t a “hoax” shooting — people actually were shot, wounded and killed (and our prayers go out to all their families for this horrific tragedy). Yet the official narrative that claims Stephen Paddock — a retired, 64-year-old accountant with absolutely no firearms training, no gun experience and no physical stamina — was somehow able to expertly wield a highly complex (and physically demanding) weapon system for 10 sustained minutes is total nonsense.
Even highly trained Navy Seals would have a difficult time running a full auto weapon for 10 minutes straight. Such weapon systems are brutal on the operator. They require tremendous strength, stamina and expert troubleshooting to keep running.
Full-auto weapons overheat and jam. They demand incredible strength to keep aimed on target. They require expert reloading and weapons clearing in the case of jams, and the hotel room would have been so full of smoke and powder residue that it would be almost impossible to keep breathing from that enclosed space.
Far from what the firearms-illiterate media claims, these are not systems that any Joe off the street can just pick up and use to effortlessly mow down 500 people. Running these systems requires extensive training, experience and stamina. It is physically impossible for a guy like Stephen Paddock to operate such a system in the sustained, effective manner that we witnessed, especially when shooting from an elevated position which throws off all the ranging of the weapon system.
Far from being a Navy Seal, Stephen Paddock is a retired accountant senior citizen with a gambling problem and a flabby physique. The only way he could have carried out this shooting is if he were transformed into a human superweapon through a magic wand. I’m calling this “Mission IMPOSSIBLE” because of the physical impossibility of a retired, untrained senior citizen pulling this off.
Here are 10+ reasons why the official narrative is complete B.S.
#1: As many as 10 rifles were found in his hotel room… but only one shooter? The NY Daily News is now reporting that Stephen Paddock “brought at least 10 weapons into a Las Vegas hotel room.” Why would a single shooter need 10 rifles? Managing just one full auto weapon system is so difficult that it’s probably beyond the physical capabilities of a 64-year-old retired accountant, which is what Paddock was.
The fact that 10 rifles were found in his hotel room says three very important things: The rifles were staged for more than one shooter.
The operation was extremely well funded. The attack took a tremendous amount of time to set up, because you don’t just walk 10 rifles up to your hotel room in a single trip.
#2: As with many orchestrated shootings, the scapegoat was murdered before he could talk According to numerous media reports, Paddock was found dead in his hotel room, shot to death. The official narrative claims that he shot himself before the police breached the room, but that is an assumption, not an established fact. There is no evidence whatsoever . . READ MORE AT NATURAL NEWS>> [ 3 VIDEOS at source]
Mike Adams (aka the “Health Ranger“) is a best selling author (#1 best selling science book on Amazon.com called “Food Forensics“), an environmental scientist, a patent holder for a cesium radioactive isotope elimination invention, a multiple award winner for outstanding journalism, a science news publisher and influential commentator on topics ranging from science and medicine to culture and politics. Follow his videos, podcasts, websites and science projects at the . . . READ MORE AT NATURAL NEWS>>
A Toxic Boon To Agrochemical Giants
By Whitney Webb
September 12, 2017
The insecticide Naled kills mosquitoes. It also wipes out honey bees, now undergoing a mass die-off attributed to its use. And it is toxic to humans, particularly newborns. It will now be sprayed on 6 million Texas acres as part of the U.S. government’s Harvey recovery plan.
Amid statewide efforts to clean up the aftermath left by the historic flooding caused by Hurricane Harvey, the Pentagon announced last week that it had dispatched C-130H Sprayers from the Air Force Reserve’s 910th Airlift Wing in order to “assist with recovery efforts in eastern Texas.” However, these “recovery efforts” have little to do with rebuilding damaged structures or with the resettlement of evacuees. Instead, they are set to spray chemicals in order to help “control pest insect populations,” which they allege pose a “health risk to rescue workers and residents of Houston.”
The Pentagon has requested that the planes treat more than 6 million acres throughout the Houston area. The Air Force notes that the current effort is “expected to significantly surpass previous [spraying] missions in scope,” specifically the spraying campaigns that followed Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.
Naled’s toxicity not confined to mosquitoes
While the Pentagon has framed its efforts to “assist” as seeking to eliminate a potential human health risk, the particular chemical it is using to control insect populations is likely to do more harm than good. According to the Air Force, the mosquito control protocol involves spraying the “Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approved and regulated material, Naled,” which the Air Force insists will not be used in amounts large enough to “cause any concern for human health.”
However, the insecticide Naled, manufactured and sold by a strategic partner of Monsanto, is currently banned in the European Union due to the “unacceptable risk” it presents to human health.
Naled is a known neurotoxin in animals and humans, as it inhibits acetylcholinesterase — an enzyme essential to nerve function and communication — and has even been known to have caused paralysis. Mounting scientific evidence, including a recent Harvard study, has also pointed to Naled’s responsibility for the mass die-off of North American bees. Just one day of Naled spraying in South Carolina . . . READ MORE>>