The Power of “Nyet” By Dmitry Orlov Club Orlov July 26, 2016 Posted Quemado Institute July 29, 2016 The way things are supposed to work on this planet is like this: in the United States, the power structures (public and private) decide what they want the rest of the world to do. They communicate their … Continue reading →
Though Hysteria Mounts, the Future is Peace By Karl Pomeroy Quemado Institute July 26, 2016 Addendum July 27, 2016 Geopolitical analysts are right to be alarmed about Bush-Obama-Clinton neoconservative policy. This arrogant agenda of reckless aggression has pushed NATO troops to the doorway of Russia, destabilized the Islamic belt of the Middle East and North … Continue reading →
Neocon Hawk Michael Pence Twice Approved Iraq War By Karl Pomeroy Quemado Institute July 16, 2016 Revised August 11, 2016: Important New Conclusion [The following is the article as it originally appeared with minor editing. My apologies to Donald Trump and his campaign team. Please see new conclusion at the end of this post. — … Continue reading →
The US Establishment Plans War to Stop Trump By Alexander Dugin Russia’s number one geopolitical thinker Information Clearing House July 11, 2016 Reposted at Quemado Institute Conclusion by Karl Pomeroy July 11, 2016 VIDEO transcript: Greetings, you’re watching Dugin’s Guideline. The situation around Russia at the international level is gradually worsening. Even the most attentive … Continue reading →
Sott.net July 2, 2016 Conclusion by Kennedy Applebaum Quemado Institute July 2, 2016 Insatiable thirst for violence: Israeli warplanes launch several airstrikes on Gaza Strip Israeli warplanes have launched several airstrikes on the Gaza Strip in yet another act of aggression against the besieged Palestinian coastal territory. [See footnote.] No casualties have yet been reported … Continue reading →
Quemado Institute editor Karl Pomeroy received a legal threat today in response to a comment he posted on the Russia Insider website about the rise of the R********d banking family. The comment did not mention race, but was of historical content. The threatener accused Karl of “spreading Nazi propaganda,” then repeated the full text of the German Criminal Code Section 130, which outlaws inciting “hatred against a national, racial, religious group or a group defined by their ethnic origins,” which Karl’s comment did not do. A similar law, it was claimed, is now in force in 11 other European countries and carries a penalty of up to five years. The wording of the law is so vague, it could be applied to any criticism of those in power. If a political analyst can accidentally “violate” this totalitarian decree, there is no freedom of speech or press in Europe.