The Quemado Institute website was founded in 2014 as a platform for thoughtful discussion on topics of current interest, including world peace, modern physics, American foreign policy in Europe and Asia, health, and the environment. Due to the urgency of the ongoing war in Donbass, the crisis in Syria, US relations with Russia, and the recent presidential election, these topics are the primary focus of the Institute at the present time.
Quemado Institute was named after the elk and wildlife refuge we own and maintain in the high mesa country near Quemado, New Mexico, (see photo). Karl William Pomeroy, Institute founder, is a retired physicist and embedded systems engineer. He now devotes his time to the in-depth study of alternative views on world affairs, particularly concerning US-Russian relations, as well as to classical and jazz piano, bagpipes, and nonstandard theories of gravity and cosmology.
Policy on comments: Thoughtful comments are welcome. Your email address will not be published, verified, or used in any way. You are welcome to post anonymously.
Quemado Institute strives to publish excellent and timely news and commentary free of charge to our readers. Please help us expand our readership by posting links on Twitter and other websites, or telling friends and colleagues.
Email contact: Messages you would rather not put in a comment may be sent to firstname.lastname@example.org.
You are welcome to republish our articles, but please post a live link to Quemado Institute.
Editor’s Note – April 10, 2016
We continue to advocate friendship with Russia and independence for the Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics. We urge as well the strategic containment of China which—unlike Russia—has not relinquished the sovereign territories it invaded and seized during the twentieth century, namely Tibet and Xinjiang. Until it grants full independence to these nations, China remains an enemy of global freedom.
On Image Copyrights
The following is the statement of the Fair Use Law on reproducing copyrighted material:
The fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include—the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; the nature of the copyrighted work; the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. Source: 17 USC Section 107.
Quemado Institute, reproduces articles and photos for nonprofit educational purposes only, including criticism, comment, news reporting and research. Although under these conditions, attribution is not required by law, we provide links to the source on all articles, and photo attributions in nearly every case, unless we are unable to find them.
For an informative article on copyright fair use for images, see Copyright Fair Use and How it Works for Online Images, by lawyer Sara Hawkins.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
On April 12, 2018, I tried to post two comments at The Duran using the word “Zionist”. Both comments were held for moderation. I reposted them using the spelling “Zyahneest”. The comments were published. Apparently The Duran uses automated software to censor free discussion of Zionism. On April 22 I was again moderated, and my well-meaning comment, on a completely different topic, was deleted. I must be on a blacklist. So who owns The Duran?
— Karl Pomeroy, Chief Editor, Quemado Institute
Quemado Institute editor Karl Pomeroy received a legal threat today in response to a comment he posted on the Russia Insider website about the rise of the R********d banking family. The comment did not mention race, but was of historical content. The threatener accused Karl of “spreading Nazi propaganda,” then repeated the full text of the German Criminal Code Section 130, which outlaws inciting “hatred against a national, racial, religious group or a group defined by their ethnic origins,” which Karl’s comment did not do. A similar law, it was claimed, is now in force in 11 other European countries and carries a penalty of up to five years. The wording of the law is so vague, it could be applied to any criticism of those in power. If a political analyst can accidentally “violate” this totalitarian decree, there is no freedom of speech or press in Europe.