By Elizabeth Vos
August 15, 2018
Posted Quemado Institute
August 17, 2018
One of the key concerns raised by the recent censorship of Infowars and Telesur is that, although the two outlets could not be more different politically and structurally, both were providing fair coverage of, or support to politically imprisoned and now totally isolated journalist Julian Assange. Since Assange was silenced in late March, his supporters continuously warned that if he were to remain unable to connect with the outside world, it would result in the silencing of the rest of us. They warned repeatedly and loudly that Assange was the last buffer between the establishment’s ire and total domination of social discourse, a canary in the coal mine of state censorship. Unfortunately, we now see that those concerns were well-founded. The unelected Western power structure and its technocratic social-media-baron proxies coordinated the recent purge of Alex Jones’s Infowars within twelve hours on the same day, then deleted the Facebook page of Telesur, a Venezuelan news network, multiple times. While Venezuelan news network Telesur had covered Assange for years, Infowars recently published a petition in support of the WikiLeaks co-founder. That Infowars and Telesur are vastly different goes without saying. However, it bears repeating that the significant bridge joining these two entities is . . . READ MORE AT DISOBEDIENT MEDIA>>
June 10, 2018
Inforwar’s Alex Jones encapsulates in this video the bold truth about the globalist agenda and US President Donald Trump’s campaign to destroy the New World Order elite. If Jones is hard to watch, just close your eyes and listen.
Must See: Trump Dominates G7, Global Battle Lines Drawn
VIDEO by Alex Jones
Published June 9, 2018
Thank you Alex Jones.
The world is waking up.
Julian Assange has remained incommunicado for more than six weeks and as his health deteriorates many of his former supporters have remained silent too, says James Cogan.
Ecuador Hints It May Hand Over Assange
By James Cogan
May 14, 2018
Julian Assange is in immense danger. Remarks made this week by Ecuador’s foreign minister suggest that her government may be preparing to renege on the political asylum it granted to the WikiLeaks editor in 2012 and hand him over to British and then American authorities.
On March 28, under immense pressure from the British and U.S. governments, Ecuador imposed a complete ban on Assange having any Internet or phone contact with the outside world, and blocked his friends and supporters from physically visiting him.
For 46 days, he has not been heard from.
Ecuadorian Foreign Minister Maria Fernanda Espinosa stated in a Spanish-language interview on Wednesday that her government and Britain “have the intention and the interest that this be resolved.” Moves were underway, she said, to reach a “definite agreement” on Assange.
If Assange falls into the hands of the British state, he faces being turned over to the U.S. Last year, U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions stated that putting Assange on trial for espionage was a “priority.” CIA director Mike Pompeo, now secretary of state, asserted that WikiLeaks was a “non-state hostile intelligence service.”
In 2010, WikiLeaks courageously published information leaked . . . READ MORE AT CONSORTIUM NEWS>> [Substantial analysis at source.]
February 2, 2018
The Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II which is a single-seat, single-engine, all-weather stealth multirole fighters is UNDERGOING FINAL DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING by the United States. The pentagon began the F 35 program in 2001 with an aim to develop a cost effective replacement for the u.s. military’s f-15 fighters, f-16 and f-18 bombers and reconnaissance aircraft, and a-10 close air support warplanes. Apart from United States,the primary customer and financial backer, the United Kingdom, Italy, the Netherlands, Canada, Turkey, Australia, Norway and Denmark are also part of the program. Many other nations like Japan and Israel are also deploying the fighters. The nine major partner nations, including the U.S, plan to acquire over 3,000 F-35s through 2035, which, if delivered will make the F-35 one of the most numerous jet fighters. The fighter aircraft will be in service till 2050.
On 2 August 2016, the U.S. Air Force declared its first squadron of F-35A fighters combat-ready. S 400 Triumph is an anti-aircraft weapon system developed by Russia’s Almaz Central Design bureau in the 1990s as an upgrade of the s-300 family. it has been in service with the Russian armed forces since 2007. It is designed to defend against aircrafts including 5th generation stealth fighters ,bombers, awacs, cruise missiles and ballistic missile. It is considered one of the most power anti aircraft defense system in the world.
In this video Defense Updates analyze the outcome when F 35 is pitted against S 400. OPTIONS in a combat environment: F 35 has the following options to defeat S 400. 1. OUT RUN 2. OUT MANEUVER A MISSILE 3. STEALTH TO AVOID DETECTION 4. USE EW SUIT TO JAM S 400 5. LONG RANGE PREEMPTIVE STANDOFF STRIKE We will analyze each of these one by one and rate the chances F 35 against S 400 on a scale of 1 to 5.
OUT RUN – But in case of F 35, the tactics will be useless since it has a top speed of only 1.6 mach and missiles deployed by s 400 have hypersonic speeds ranging from 6 Mach to 14 Mach. For example, 40N6 missile has a speed of 14 Mach.
OUT MANEUVER – F 35 is not designed to be a great dogfighter and lacks agility when compared to fighters like F 22 or SU 35. The need for the small F 35 to carry a heavy range of internal engines, fuel and weapons has resulted in what aviation experts labels a ‘high wing loading’. essentially, the wings are small in relation to its weight and this impedes maneuverability. F 35 also has a sluggish rate of climb when compared to modern fighters.
STEALTH – The trump card of F 35 against any air defense system is that , it is a stealthy aircraft. But F 35’s simplified airframe is far less of the ‘shaped stealth’ found in the F 22. This implies a much greater reliance on radar-absorbing materials. * Against x-band radars, it is only stealthy (lo) from front and rear; * Against s-band radar, it is stealthy from narrow front aspect, * Against l-band radar. limited reduction is achieved from direct front The nabob svn & zebu m have a claimed capability against stealth aircraft. Keeping in view the different aspects, F 35 will be vulnerable in a combat scenario.
EM SUIT – All three variants of the F 35 carry Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radars with sophisticated electronic attack capabilities, including false targets, network attack, advanced jamming and algorithm-packed data streams. This system allows the F 35 to reach well-defended targets and suppress enemy radars that threaten the F 35.
LONG RANGE PREEMPTIVE STANDOFF STRIKE – S 400 is designed to be mobile. All system components are carried by self-propelled wheeled all-terrain chassis. Even if detected, S 400 will be a very very tough nut to crack. Just one S 400 system can control up to 72 launchers, with a maximum of 384 missiles. This means that system has enough ammunition & targeting strength to take down a saturation attack.Also an important aspect is that for aerodynamic target and ballistic targets, the minimum engagement range is only 2 and 5 km respectively . A separate independent air defense system 42S6 Morfey , is being developed by Russia’s Almaz-Antey corporation. This system is designated as short-range air defense system, and will protect the s-400 from various threats at their terminal phases.
CONCLUSION As per our analysis, F 35 will find it difficult to operate in areas protected by S 400. This means the not only us but the partner nations will find it hard to gain air supremacy, which is vital in modern conflicts.
VIDEO by TheHealthRanger – Natural News – October 9, 2017
Republished at Paul Craig Roberts Official Website
Click for VIDEO
In essence, because of the differences in the speed of sound vs. the speed of the bullets from a known cartridge (.223 Remington, in this case), the time lag between the last bullet hitting the pavement and the last audible report of the rifle muzzle can be used to very accurately calculate the range of the shooter.
More importantly, when the audio from the Las Vegas shooting is analyzed, it reveals TWO shooters operating at the same time, not just one shooter. Shooter #1 is operating at 425 – 475 yards, which is consistent with the Mandalay Bay hotel, but shooter #2 is operating at approximately 250 – 270 yards.
For more analysis on Las Vegas shooting, see Carnicom Institute:
By Mike Adams
October 2, 2017
What we know for sure is that, yes, 59 people were killed (so far) and hundreds were wounded. This wasn’t a “hoax” shooting — people actually were shot, wounded and killed (and our prayers go out to all their families for this horrific tragedy). Yet the official narrative that claims Stephen Paddock — a retired, 64-year-old accountant with absolutely no firearms training, no gun experience and no physical stamina — was somehow able to expertly wield a highly complex (and physically demanding) weapon system for 10 sustained minutes is total nonsense.
Even highly trained Navy Seals would have a difficult time running a full auto weapon for 10 minutes straight. Such weapon systems are brutal on the operator. They require tremendous strength, stamina and expert troubleshooting to keep running.
Full-auto weapons overheat and jam. They demand incredible strength to keep aimed on target. They require expert reloading and weapons clearing in the case of jams, and the hotel room would have been so full of smoke and powder residue that it would be almost impossible to keep breathing from that enclosed space.
Far from what the firearms-illiterate media claims, these are not systems that any Joe off the street can just pick up and use to effortlessly mow down 500 people. Running these systems requires extensive training, experience and stamina. It is physically impossible for a guy like Stephen Paddock to operate such a system in the sustained, effective manner that we witnessed, especially when shooting from an elevated position which throws off all the ranging of the weapon system.
Far from being a Navy Seal, Stephen Paddock is a retired accountant senior citizen with a gambling problem and a flabby physique. The only way he could have carried out this shooting is if he were transformed into a human superweapon through a magic wand. I’m calling this “Mission IMPOSSIBLE” because of the physical impossibility of a retired, untrained senior citizen pulling this off.
Here are 10+ reasons why the official narrative is complete B.S.
#1: As many as 10 rifles were found in his hotel room… but only one shooter? The NY Daily News is now reporting that Stephen Paddock “brought at least 10 weapons into a Las Vegas hotel room.” Why would a single shooter need 10 rifles? Managing just one full auto weapon system is so difficult that it’s probably beyond the physical capabilities of a 64-year-old retired accountant, which is what Paddock was.
The fact that 10 rifles were found in his hotel room says three very important things: The rifles were staged for more than one shooter.
The operation was extremely well funded. The attack took a tremendous amount of time to set up, because you don’t just walk 10 rifles up to your hotel room in a single trip.
#2: As with many orchestrated shootings, the scapegoat was murdered before he could talk According to numerous media reports, Paddock was found dead in his hotel room, shot to death. The official narrative claims that he shot himself before the police breached the room, but that is an assumption, not an established fact. There is no evidence whatsoever . . READ MORE AT NATURAL NEWS>> [ 3 VIDEOS at source]
Mike Adams (aka the “Health Ranger“) is a best selling author (#1 best selling science book on Amazon.com called “Food Forensics“), an environmental scientist, a patent holder for a cesium radioactive isotope elimination invention, a multiple award winner for outstanding journalism, a science news publisher and influential commentator on topics ranging from science and medicine to culture and politics. Follow his videos, podcasts, websites and science projects at the . . . READ MORE AT NATURAL NEWS>>
A Toxic Boon To Agrochemical Giants
By Whitney Webb
September 12, 2017
The insecticide Naled kills mosquitoes. It also wipes out honey bees, now undergoing a mass die-off attributed to its use. And it is toxic to humans, particularly newborns. It will now be sprayed on 6 million Texas acres as part of the U.S. government’s Harvey recovery plan.
Amid statewide efforts to clean up the aftermath left by the historic flooding caused by Hurricane Harvey, the Pentagon announced last week that it had dispatched C-130H Sprayers from the Air Force Reserve’s 910th Airlift Wing in order to “assist with recovery efforts in eastern Texas.” However, these “recovery efforts” have little to do with rebuilding damaged structures or with the resettlement of evacuees. Instead, they are set to spray chemicals in order to help “control pest insect populations,” which they allege pose a “health risk to rescue workers and residents of Houston.”
The Pentagon has requested that the planes treat more than 6 million acres throughout the Houston area. The Air Force notes that the current effort is “expected to significantly surpass previous [spraying] missions in scope,” specifically the spraying campaigns that followed Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.
Naled’s toxicity not confined to mosquitoes
While the Pentagon has framed its efforts to “assist” as seeking to eliminate a potential human health risk, the particular chemical it is using to control insect populations is likely to do more harm than good. According to the Air Force, the mosquito control protocol involves spraying the “Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approved and regulated material, Naled,” which the Air Force insists will not be used in amounts large enough to “cause any concern for human health.”
However, the insecticide Naled, manufactured and sold by a strategic partner of Monsanto, is currently banned in the European Union due to the “unacceptable risk” it presents to human health.
Naled is a known neurotoxin in animals and humans, as it inhibits acetylcholinesterase — an enzyme essential to nerve function and communication — and has even been known to have caused paralysis. Mounting scientific evidence, including a recent Harvard study, has also pointed to Naled’s responsibility for the mass die-off of North American bees. Just one day of Naled spraying in South Carolina . . . READ MORE>>