Who Fueled the Terror in Paris and What Should be Done about it Now? Opinion by Karl Pomeroy Quemado Institute November 15, 2015 Updated November 16, 2015 (See end of post) Political commentator Daniel Lazare wrote yesterday in Consortium News a broad interpretive analysis of the November 13, 2015 Paris terror attacks. Whether or not … Continue reading →
Outcome of Talks: Two Presentations by Kennedy Applebaum Quemado Institute August 27, 2015 Edited August 29, 2015 Were the talks in Berlin peace talks, or war talks? TASS News Agency gives one unsettling answer, while Fort Russ presents another still more ambiguous one. According to TASS, Konstantin Yeliseyev, a senior Ukrainian official, has suggested that … Continue reading →
by Karl Pomeroy Quemado Institute June 13, 2015 Denis Pushilin, the Donetsk People’s Republic Minsk Contact Group envoy, has once again declared there will be no Minsk 3.0, adding that Kiev’s only chance for peace is to comply with the Minsk 2.0 Agreements. Meanwhile, the Ukrainian Armed Forces continue to shell civilians, and the Verkhovna … Continue reading →
Donetsk People’s Republic Prime Minister Alexander Zakharchenko, one of the greatest of world leaders, was assassinated today, August 31, 2018, no doubt by Ukrainian saboteurs. He gave his life willingly for the freedom of his country. Let us know he has not died in vain.
For those who mourn the death of DPR President Alexander Zakharchenko, there is some consolation to be found in the comment section at The Saker.
Full Report at NEWS FROM NOVOROSSIYA
Quemado Institute editor Karl Pomeroy received a legal threat today in response to a comment he posted on the Russia Insider website about the rise of the R********d banking family. The comment did not mention race, but was of historical content. The threatener accused Karl of “spreading Nazi propaganda,” then repeated the full text of the German Criminal Code Section 130, which outlaws inciting “hatred against a national, racial, religious group or a group defined by their ethnic origins,” which Karl’s comment did not do. A similar law, it was claimed, is now in force in 11 other European countries and carries a penalty of up to five years. The wording of the law is so vague, it could be applied to any criticism of those in power. If a political analyst can accidentally “violate” this totalitarian decree, there is no freedom of speech or press in Europe.