Ukraine, Korea, Syria, Iran … Falsifying History Is Uncle Sam’s Way to War By Finian Cunningham Strategic Culture Foundation April 22, 2017 Posted with Endnote by Quemado Institute April 24, 2017 Russian President Vladimir Putin addressed the International Arctic Forum this week [March 30, 2017] on the real and present dangers from falsifying history. He … Continue reading →
Putin Slams US Democratic Party As “Shameless Losers”, Says Russia Alone Believed In Trump’s Victory By Tyler Durden Zero Hedge December 23, 2016 With Concluding Commentary on Donbass by Karl Pomeroy Quemado Institute December 23, 2016 Last edit January 2, 2017 Covering numerous topics, from foreign politics to the Russian budget, the price of oil, … Continue reading →
Outcome of Talks: Two Presentations by Kennedy Applebaum Quemado Institute August 27, 2015 Edited August 29, 2015 Were the talks in Berlin peace talks, or war talks? TASS News Agency gives one unsettling answer, while Fort Russ presents another still more ambiguous one. According to TASS, Konstantin Yeliseyev, a senior Ukrainian official, has suggested that … Continue reading →
Donetsk People’s Republic Prime Minister Alexander Zakharchenko, one of the greatest of world leaders, was assassinated today, August 31, 2018, no doubt by Ukrainian saboteurs. He gave his life willingly for the freedom of his country. Let us know he has not died in vain.
For those who mourn the death of DPR President Alexander Zakharchenko, there is some consolation to be found in the comment section at The Saker.
Full Report at NEWS FROM NOVOROSSIYA
Quemado Institute editor Karl Pomeroy received a legal threat today in response to a comment he posted on the Russia Insider website about the rise of the R********d banking family. The comment did not mention race, but was of historical content. The threatener accused Karl of “spreading Nazi propaganda,” then repeated the full text of the German Criminal Code Section 130, which outlaws inciting “hatred against a national, racial, religious group or a group defined by their ethnic origins,” which Karl’s comment did not do. A similar law, it was claimed, is now in force in 11 other European countries and carries a penalty of up to five years. The wording of the law is so vague, it could be applied to any criticism of those in power. If a political analyst can accidentally “violate” this totalitarian decree, there is no freedom of speech or press in Europe.
can this be done