Ukraine Civil War, Western Intervention

US Funds Neo-Nazi Azov Battalion in Ukraine

Congress Has Removed a Ban on Funding Neo-Nazis
From Its Year-End Spending Bill

Guest Article by By James Carden

The Nation
January 14, 2016

Volunteers from ultranationalist Azov battalion train near Mariupol. (http://catholicchurchapologetics.yuku.com)

Volunteers from ultranationalist Azov battalion train near Mariupol. (–catholicchurchapologetics.yuku.com)

Under pressure from the Pentagon, Congress has stripped the spending bill of an amendment that prevented funds from falling into the hands of Ukrainian neo-fascist groups.

In mid-December 2015, Congress passed a 2,000-plus-page omnibus spending bill for fiscal year 2016. Both parties were quick to declare victory after the passage of the $1.8 trillion dollar package. White House spokesman Josh Earnest told reporters “we feel good about the outcome, primarily because we got a compromise budget agreement that fought off a wide variety of ideological riders.” The office of House Speaker Paul J. Ryan touted the bill’s “64 billion for overseas contingency operations” for, among other things, assisting ”European countries facing Russian aggression.”

It would be safe to assume that one of the European countries which would stand to benefit from the omnibus measure—designed, in part, to combat “Russian aggression”—would be Ukraine, which has already, according to the White House, received $2 billion in loan guarantees and nearly $760 million in “security, programmatic, and technical assistance” since February 2014.

Yet some have expressed concern that some of this aid has made its way into the hands of neo-Nazi groups, such as the Azov Battalion. Last summer the Daily Beast published an interview by the journalists Will Cathcart and Joseph Epstein in which a member of the Azov battalion spoke about “his battalion’s experience with U.S. trainers and U.S. volunteers quite fondly, even mentioning U.S. volunteers engineers and medics that are still currently assisting them.”

And so, in July of last year, Congressmen John Conyers of Michigan and Ted Yoho of Florida drew up an amendment to the House Defense Appropriations bill (HR 2685) that “limits arms, training, and other assistance to the neo-Nazi Ukrainian militia, the Azov Battalion.” It passed by a unanimous vote in the House.

And yet by the time November came around and the conference debate over the year end appropriations bill was underway, the Conyers-Yoho measure appeared to be in jeopardy. And indeed it was. An official familiar with the debate told The Nation that the House Defense Appropriations Committee came under pressure from the Pentagon to remove the Conyers-Yoho amendment from the text of the bill.

The Pentagon’s objection to the Conyers-Yoho amendment rests on the claim that it is redundant because similar legislation—known as the Leahy law—already exists which would prevent the funding of Azov. This, as it turns out, is untrue. The Leahy law only covers those groups for which the “Secretary of State has credible information that such unit has committed a gross violation of human rights.” Yet the State department has never claimed to have such information, therefore funding to Azov cannot be blocked by the Leahy law. The congressional source I spoke to pointed out that “even if Azov is already covered by Leahy, then no there was no need to strip it out of final bill.” Indeed, the Leahy law cannot block funding to groups, no matter how noxious their ideology in lieu of “credible information” that they have committed human rights violations. The Conyers-Yoho amendment was designed to remedy that shortcoming.

The combat force of about 250 men [Azov Battalion] consists primarily of far-right activists, including around a dozen foreign volunteer fighters. (--Off-Guardian.com)

A combat force of about 250 men, the Azov Battalion consists primarily of far-right activists, including about a dozen foreign volunteer fighters. (–Off-Guardian.com)

Considering the fact that the US Army has been training Ukrainian armed forces and national guard troops, the Conyers-Yoho amendment made a great deal of sense; blocking the avowedly neo-Nazi Azov battalion from receiving US assistance would further what President Obama often refers to as “our interests and values.”

That neo-Nazis (or neo-fascists, if you prefer) are a distinctly minority taste in Western Ukraine, is clear and is not in dispute. Of late, however, there have been, troubling signs that they may become a force to be reckoned with. According to The Jerusalem Post, in Ukrainian municipal elections held last October, the neo-Nazi Svoboda party won 10 percent of the vote in Kiev and placed second in Lviv. The Svoboda party’s candidate actually won the mayoral election in the city of Konotop. Meanwhile, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty reported in November that Azov operates a boot camp which exposes children to “the regiment’s far right-wing ideology.”

Whether White House spokesman Josh Earnest was referring, in part, to the Conyers-Yoho amendment as one of those “ideological riders” the administration fought to defeat is unclear. What is clear is that by stripping out the anti-neo-Nazi provision, Congress and the administration have paved the way for US funding to end up in the hands of the most noxious elements circulating within Ukraine today.

James Carden

James Carden

James W. Carden is a contributing writer at The Nation and the executive editor for the American Committee for East-West Accord’s EastWestAccord.com. A Washington, DC-based journalist focusing on US foreign policy, his articles and essays have also appeared in The American Conservative and The National Interest. Carden served as an Advisor to the US-Russia Presidential Commission at the US State Department. Since then, he has contributed articles on US-Russia policy to The National Interest, the New York Times, The Moscow Times and was featured in the BBC’s ‘best of’ global opinion roundup. He graduated from the Johns Hopkins University and the Moscow State Institute of International Relations.

Advertisements

Discussion

One thought on “US Funds Neo-Nazi Azov Battalion in Ukraine

  1. USA has constantly talked of Russian aggression, yet seems totally oblivious of its own. USA has almost surrounded Russian territory with its armaments, it has unleashed a propaganda war worthy of a Pullitzer. It does not listen, it has no diplomacy to speak of, wherever USA goes there is chaos and controversy – East Ukraine borders Russia, it’s speaks mainly Russian, from his name Zarachenko is Ukrainian, yet leads the Novorussian militia. These people are not just Russian also Ukrainian, they want to leave Kiev rule but do not want Russian rule, they want independence and willing to trade and keep diplomacy with both Russia and Ukraine. USA is upping the anti by bankrolling Azov, who have every right to live in the Ukraine of their choice, just not in the East. USA has a great deal invested in the future of Ukraine, not entirely above board, and as with American interests elsewhere in the world, their interests come first and they will go to any length to get and keep it – including war by proxy – by which making the East of Ukraine, Novorussia, the best villains and Azov the best solution.

    Liked by 1 person

    Posted by volodya60 | April 14, 2016, 2:12 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

News from Novorossiya

Thursday April 27, 2017 - Breaking News from DONBASS Today

News from Novorossiya

April 25, 2017: OSCE Mission Car Blast in Donbass: Accidental Explosion or 'False Flag' by Kiev?

News From Novorossiya

April 20, 2017: [Bloomberg Report] Putin Quietly Detaches Ukraine's Rebel Zones as U.S. Waffles - by Henry Meyer, Ilya Arkhipov, Stepan Kravchenko, Yuliya Fedorinova

News from Novorossiya

April 19, 2017: International Court of Justice Rules Implausible Ukrainian Charge of Russian Terrorist Financing

News from Novorossiya

April 18, 2017: Savchenko: Ukraine has lost Donbass / By Inessa Sinchougova (Antifascist.com) / Fort Russ

News from Novorossiya

Apr 12 2017: Fierce Battle Near Donetsk With Use of Artillery, Armored Vehicles

— Novorossiya Daily Sun — —– Official Website Link —–

Official Link To Quemado Institute's Dedicated Donbass News Site

——– Quemado Institute ——– – Index of Latest Articles –

-- Click for Index of Latest Articles -- April 8, 2017: US Syria Strike Threatens Donbass, Europe – By Eduard Popov / Fort Russ

Quemado Institute Home Page

April 9, 2017: BREAKING: Dramatic Escalation in Syria - By Sophie Mangal

Quemado Institute Syria Page

Feb 28, 2017: Will a Humanitarian Plan for Syria Save the Negotiations in Geneva? By Sophie Mangal

Quemado Institute Opintion Page

Sunday March 12, 2017: Wikileaks Vault 7: We've Created A Monster! Ron Paul Says It's "Fantastic" That WikiLeaks Exposed The CIA - By Tyler Durden - ZeroHedge

Quemado Journal of Gravitational Physics Official Website Link

Investigations in nonstandard theories of gravity and cosmology.

Follow Quemado Institute on WordPress.com

Archives

Categories

Recent Posts

%d bloggers like this: