[We pay tribute to GIVI, Symbol of Donbass, RIP – See end of post] ___________________ Post-Coup Ukraine President Arranges Talks By Kennedy Applebaum Quemado Institute February 4, 2017 [Addendum February 5, 2017: Nikki Haley’s Full Statement] Unconfirmed fake news sources such as UNIAN and Radio Free Europe report today that U.S. President Donald Trump and … Continue reading →
Quemado Institute May 12, 2015 [Updated May 13; See third article below.] The meeting in Sochi, Russia, which took place today between US Secretary of State John Kerry, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, and Russian President Vladimir Putin, was not only cordial, but fostered an important breakthrough in American thinking. It is a sign of … Continue reading →
by Kennedy Applebaum Quemado Institute April 19, 2015 What is needed for peace in Ukraine is a whole new agreement: The Minsk Chapter III Trilateral Peace Plan. Not to be confused with “Minsk 3.0”, that hypothetical disaster which Donetsk People’s Republic Prime Minister Alexander Zakharchenko has rightly said will never happen, the Chapter III Peace … Continue reading →
Tass March 22, 2015 Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko should first of all focus on implementing all points of the Minsk agreements before local elections in Donbass, head of the self-proclaimed Lugansk People’s Republic (LPR) Igor Plotnitsky said on Sunday.”We will decide by ourselves, without Pyotr Alexeevich [Poroshenko] whether to take part in the elections when … Continue reading →
by Karl Pomeroy Quemado Institute March 21, 2015 The 2014 American-led coup shattered Ukraine’s administrative integrity. President Viktor Yanukovich’s violent overthrow broke constitutional law, and his pseudo-impeachment in absentia did not restore due process. The voiding of Ukraine’s constitution nullified the criteria for rulership, leaving them open to anyone’s guess. . Out of this legal … Continue reading →
By Stephen J. Lendman The Real Agenda News March 19, 2015 Minsk II terms Kiev agreed to mandated parliamentary legislation affording Donbass “special regime” self-rule within 30 days of the document’s February 12 signing. Kiev missed the deadline. On March 17, it reneged. It passed draft legislation only. It declared Donetsk and Lugansk “temporarily occupied … Continue reading →
by Karl Pomeroy Quemado Institute March 18, 2015 The “Normandy Trio”, comprising German Chancellor Angela Merkel, French President Francois Hollande, and Russian President Vladimir Putin, are all foreign bureaucrats that have nothing to do with the Ukraine war. Yet, acting as Agents of Virtue, they stepped in to intervene. The result was the Minsk 2.0 … Continue reading →
by Karl Pomeroy March 16, 2015 It is no longer acceptable to any reasonable person who supports the freedom and independence of Novorossiya that Russian leaders should continue to vacillate and cower under Western pressure and act the weaker of nations. Russia must now begin to stand up to the West and to the United … Continue reading →
Donetsk People’s Republic Prime Minister Alexander Zakharchenko, one of the greatest of world leaders, was assassinated today, August 31, 2018, no doubt by Ukrainian saboteurs. He gave his life willingly for the freedom of his country. Let us know he has not died in vain.
For those who mourn the death of DPR President Alexander Zakharchenko, there is some consolation to be found in the comment section at The Saker.
Full Report at NEWS FROM NOVOROSSIYA
Quemado Institute editor Karl Pomeroy received a legal threat today in response to a comment he posted on the Russia Insider website about the rise of the R********d banking family. The comment did not mention race, but was of historical content. The threatener accused Karl of “spreading Nazi propaganda,” then repeated the full text of the German Criminal Code Section 130, which outlaws inciting “hatred against a national, racial, religious group or a group defined by their ethnic origins,” which Karl’s comment did not do. A similar law, it was claimed, is now in force in 11 other European countries and carries a penalty of up to five years. The wording of the law is so vague, it could be applied to any criticism of those in power. If a political analyst can accidentally “violate” this totalitarian decree, there is no freedom of speech or press in Europe.
can this be done