Donald Trump, Western Politics

Who Won the GOP Debate? Donald Trump – Analysis

Trump the Peace Candidate, Cruz the Neocon

Trump reiterates desire to get along with Russia. … Fox News Debate spectacle an embarrassment to the United States on the foreign stage.

By Karl Pomeroy
Quemado Institute
March 4, 2016
Updated March 5, 2016

Marco Rubio, Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, John Kasich take stage at Fox GOP Debate, Detroit, March 3, 2016

Marco Rubio, Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, and John Kasich take the stage at Fox GOP Debate, Detroit, March 3, 2016

Donald Trump has been voted the overwhelming victor in last night’s Fox News interrogation, inaptly called the “Republican Presidential Debate,” which was held in Detroit, Michigan.

As of 15:30 UTC March 4, the online kmtv.com poll, with 20,670 participants, shows Trump carrying 78% of the winner vote. Vicious tactics backfired on Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio, who received only single digit support. John Kasich gained considerably, having avoided the fray and focused on issues.

Trump also did well in the Time poll, with 65% of the vote:

Who won the GOP debate?

Kntv.com Poll – 20,670 votes

Trump    78%
Cruz          5%
Rubio        4%
Kasich      12%

Time.com Poll – 40,302 votes

Trump       65%
Cruz             7%
Rubio           7%
Kasich         21%

The debate itself amounted to a barbaric grilling of the front-runner billionaire by Fox News moderators, encouraged by back-runner candidates Rubio and Cruz, who sank to a level of personal attack not even fit to print. The spectacle was an embarrassment to the United States on the foreign stage.

It is difficult to imagine any world leader standing up graciously to such vilification in front an audience of millions. The blame for this lies with Fox News, which is not a mature enough venue to handle what should be a serious discussion platform.

Mitt Romney (--wnd.com)

Mitt Romney (–wnd.com)

Fox “moderators” played on Mitt Romney’s recent Judas-like betrayal of Trump, in which the 2004 loser Republican candidate fired at Trump’s noninterventionist foreign policy, saying it would make the world “less safe”.

How safe was the world under George W. Bush? How safe is it under Obama? How could it be any less safe than it is now? At a point when Trump was able to gain a moment of quiet in the cacophany, he said, “Wouldn’t it be nice if the United States could get along with other countries?”

Yes, wouldn’t it.

Trump also reiterated the desire to get along with Russia, marking him the top candidate for peace.

Pressure was placed on the business mogul with a surprise trick of showing him on video—inappropriate in a debate format—supposedly contradicting himself on three occasions. A minor change of opinion in a remark about US presence in Afghanistan was the only instance that might merit question. I heard no contradiciton in the other two statements. Yet Fox moderator Megan Kelly rudely insisted Trump answer all three accusations at once, rather than one a time, in an obvious attempt to keep him off balance.

Trump stood his ground, despite intense pressure from moderators and debators alike, repeating that the US should never have gone into Iraq. He did not retract his statement that George W. Bush lied about Saddam Hussein’s alleged weapons of mass destruction.

Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, GOP Debate

Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, Fox GOP Debate, Detroit

Then Fox News showed a video of Trump saying confidently, “I think I can work with Putin.” This was a bald attempt to force him to retract that intelligent assertion. Ted Cruz then turned on him, claiming, “Donald doesn’t seem to realize how dangerous Putin is,” adding that we need to send more military assistance into Ukraine to stop Putin’s aggression.

These statements brand Cruz a neocon to rival Hillary Clinton.

Vladimir Putin (--newsfirst.lk)

Vladimir Putin (–newsfirst.lk)

The unfounded vilification of Trump is beginning to resemble that of Vladimir Putin, who is repeatedly attacked by Western neoconservatives for actions that are reasonable and peaceful. The US neocons and their global elite sponsors have fallen into such a destructive frame of mind, they cannot stand the sight of goodness, like vampires shrinking from a cross. They seem to believe the world is “safer” if destroyed by nuclear war. Mutually reinforcing their own paranoia, the elite have descended into lynch mob mentality. And they are taking it out on Donald Trump.

The billionaire’s views are, alas, not perfect from the standpoint of enlightened reason—although predominantly so. For example, Trump reiterates his support of waterboarding in the context of terrorist Islamic extremists, who themselves commit unspeakable crimes against Christians. [Update: Trump has since reversed his opinion on waterboarding.] But enhanced interrogation is not acceptable under any pretext. First, there are always innocent victims. Second, it does not lead to truth.

That Trump advocates waterboarding, although a bad mark on his record, does not change the fact that he is the most reasonable of the candidates on foreign policy issues.

Trump erred on another point when he called Edward Snowden “a spy”, apparently trying to retract previous statements that Snowden was a whistleblower who exposed the crimes of the NSA. Edward Snowden is not a spy. The true story on Snowden is that he is a patriot who performed an act of civil disobedience. Snowden broke some serious laws. But if he is to be prosecuted, the US government should also be prosecuted for the crimes Snowden revealed.

Trump with wife Melania after Fox GOP Debate, Detroit, March 3, 2016

Donald Trump with wife Melania interviewed by reporter following Fox GOP Debate, Detroit, March 3, 2016

How many destructive attacks can one man endure? Putin has survived US neocon attacks by virtue of his physical separation of hundreds or thousands of miles. Trump is right here, trying to work within the two-party system. Unfortunately, neither Republicans nor Democrats have the right ideas on every issue, so a reasonable candidate does not fit well into either party. And now, Trump’s reasonable policies on world affairs are being attacked by Republicans as “non-Republican.”

There is no doubt the Republican Party and the US ruling establishment are pulling out all stops to stop Trump’s candidacy.

All we the people can do is support him all the more.

Discussion

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

News from Novorossiya

Sunday, September 10, 2017 - Breaking News from DONBASS Today

News from Novorossiya

Russia’s UN Peacekeeper Plan Anticipates US-Backed Kiev Offensive - By Finian Cunningham - Strategic Culture Foundation - September 10, 2017

Quemado Institute Home Page

How Much Longer Will Truth Be Permitted? - Paul Craig Roberts (With VIDEO - Van Cliburn, Moscow, 1958) - Whatever Happened to America? - By Paul Craig Roberts - September 19, 2017

News from Novorossiya

VIDEO - Pianist Valentina Lisitsa Comes to Saur Mogila, Donetsk People's Republic - September 9, 2017 - Interview by Donbass Rose - Concert Video September 10, 2017

Quemado Institute Planet Page

US Gov’t Pesticide Spraying In Wake Of Harvey - A Toxic Boon To Agrochemical Giants - By Whitney Webb - Mint Press News - Posted September 14, 2017

Quemado institute Syria Page

US Orders South Syria Rebels to Retreat Into Jordan - CIA Requests' Rebel Groups Stop Fighting - By Jason Ditz - AntiWar.com - September 10, 2017

Quemado Institute Syria Page

Middle Eastern Analysts Evaluate the Battle for Deir ez-Zor Outcome - By Yuriy Zinin - New Eastern Outlook - September 10, 2017

Quemado Institute Opinion Page

GeoEngineeringWatch.org VIDEO - CIA Agent Whistleblower Risks All To Expose the Shadow Government - Posted September 7, 2017

Quemado Institute Editorial

Cataclysm of Planetary Decline: Are Insects Facing Extinction? Apocalyptic Forewarning - By Karl Pomeroy - Quemado Institute - August 30, 2017

Quemado Institute Editorial

Afghanistan Escalation: Full Analysis by Quemado Institute - Donald Trump and the War of the Imperial West - By Karl Pomeroy - August 26, 2017

Quemado Institute Report

Google Censorship Under Scrutiny – By Claire Connelly - With introduction by Quemado Institute - August 19, 2017 - Revised September 4, 2017

News from Novorossiya

VIDEO: Heavy fire fight between DNR and Ukraine forceson front line bordering Peski and Donetsk - By Patrick Lancaster - Tuesday August 22, 2017

News from Novorossiya

Pentagon Denounces American Nazis While Arming Ukrainian Nazis - By Finian Cunningham - Strategic Culture Foundation - Tuesday August 22, 2017

Quemado Institute Syria Page

Syrian Army Continues to Approach Deir Ezzor - Syria Summary - Towards the End of the Caliphate - August 28, 2017

Boycott Google – Try Alternate Search Engines:

DuckDuckGo
Bing
Cuyahoga Libnet

Support internet freedom.

Quemado Institute Opinion Page

VIDEO – Are Closed Walmarts Being Converted To FEMA Internment Camps? - These journalists raise troublesome questions we can’t answer - Posted. September 6, 2017

Latest Articles – Index

Index of latest articles - Afghanistan Escalation: Full Analysis by Quemado Institute

News from Novorossiya

August 14, 2017: Entire Black Sea coast of Ukraine will become the military base of the USA - Fort Russ

Novorossiya Daily Sun -Official Website Link-

Official Link To Quemado Institute's Dedicated Donbass News Site

Quemado Journal of Gravitational Physics Official Website Link

Investigations in nonstandard theories of gravity and cosmology.

Follow Quemado Institute on WordPress.com

Archives

Categories

Censorship Looms Over European Union

Quemado Institute editor Karl Pomeroy received a legal threat today in response to a comment he posted on the Russia Insider website about the rise of the R********d banking family. The comment did not mention race, but was of historical content. The threatener accused Karl of “spreading Nazi propaganda,” then repeated the full text of the German Criminal Code Section 130, which outlaws inciting “hatred against a national, racial, religious group or a group defined by their ethnic origins,” which Karl’s comment did not do. A similar law, it was claimed, is now in force in 11 other European countries and carries a penalty of up to five years. The wording of the law is so vague, it could be applied to any criticism of those in power. If a political analyst can accidentally “violate” this totalitarian decree, there is no freedom of speech or press in Europe.

Recent Posts

%d bloggers like this: