Anonymous Russian Volunteer Describes Uncertain Status Introduction by Quemado Institute October 1, 2015 We have wanted to report on the frontline conditions experienced by the fighters in Novorossiya for some time, but have been faced with a dearth of information. This is not like the old days, when combat reports were abundant. The following article … Continue reading →
Minsk Agreements and Fraudulence of Ukrainian Authorities A Guest Commentary by Alexander Donetsky Strategic Culture Foundation July 27, 2015 The settlement of local ethnic conflicts is considered to be one of the most difficult diplomatic problems. The reason for this is that reconciliation does not require the government or the armies of both sides, but … Continue reading →
by Kennedy Applebaum Quemado Institute July 6, 2015 There has to be an alternative to the Minsk 2.0 Agreements. The prospect for success is zero percent. Short of regime change in the Ukraine capital, there is not even the faintest chance the Kiev government will comply with Minsk, and especially not with the Package of … Continue reading →
by Karl Pomeroy Quemado Institute June 27, 2015 The misinformation Kiev is perpetrating about the amendments to the Ukraine constitution, a mandate of the Minsk 2.0 Package of Measures signed on February 12, betrays a transparent ploy by regime leader Petro Poroshenko to fortify his image among European leaders, a sham these officials are happy … Continue reading →
by Kennedy Applebaum Quemado Institute June 22, 2015 . Vladimir Horbulin, the head of Ukraine’s Strategic Studies Institute, former secretary of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine, and advisor to Kiev regime leader Petro Poroshenko, has offered five scenarios for possible outcomes for the Ukraine-Novorossiya war. I present Horbulin’s scenarios first, then the … Continue reading →
by Karl Pomeroy Quemado Institute June 13, 2015 Denis Pushilin, the Donetsk People’s Republic Minsk Contact Group envoy, has once again declared there will be no Minsk 3.0, adding that Kiev’s only chance for peace is to comply with the Minsk 2.0 Agreements. Meanwhile, the Ukrainian Armed Forces continue to shell civilians, and the Verkhovna … Continue reading →
Special Commentary by Kennedy Applebaum February 18, 2015 [Editor’s note: This commentary was originally posted on February 18, 2015. We are reposting it on June 12, 2015 from deleted archives to preserve the record.] . At the time of Minsk Agreement 2.0, the Kiev government seemed to be in a winning position. Its weak pawns … Continue reading →
by Karl Pomeroy Quemado Institute June 9, 2015 Edited June 10, 2015 The Amendments to the Ukraine Constitution, as proposed by the Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics in accordance with the package of measures of the February 2015 Minsk 2.0 Agreements, were published on June 8 at the Donetsk News Agency website. We present these … Continue reading →
Quemado Institute April 29, 2015 Quemado Institute has been described by a Donetsk-based news outlet as “the editorial board of Novorossiya.” We appreciate the recognition. We are a small group of physicists and engineers who live in the United States and own an elk and wildlife preserve near the town of Quemado, New Mexico. Hence … Continue reading →
by Kennedy Applebaum Quemado Institute April 19, 2015 What is needed for peace in Ukraine is a whole new agreement: The Minsk Chapter III Trilateral Peace Plan. Not to be confused with “Minsk 3.0”, that hypothetical disaster which Donetsk People’s Republic Prime Minister Alexander Zakharchenko has rightly said will never happen, the Chapter III Peace … Continue reading →
Donetsk People’s Republic Prime Minister Alexander Zakharchenko, one of the greatest of world leaders, was assassinated today, August 31, 2018, no doubt by Ukrainian saboteurs. He gave his life willingly for the freedom of his country. Let us know he has not died in vain.
For those who mourn the death of DPR President Alexander Zakharchenko, there is some consolation to be found in the comment section at The Saker.
Full Report at NEWS FROM NOVOROSSIYA
Quemado Institute editor Karl Pomeroy received a legal threat today in response to a comment he posted on the Russia Insider website about the rise of the R********d banking family. The comment did not mention race, but was of historical content. The threatener accused Karl of “spreading Nazi propaganda,” then repeated the full text of the German Criminal Code Section 130, which outlaws inciting “hatred against a national, racial, religious group or a group defined by their ethnic origins,” which Karl’s comment did not do. A similar law, it was claimed, is now in force in 11 other European countries and carries a penalty of up to five years. The wording of the law is so vague, it could be applied to any criticism of those in power. If a political analyst can accidentally “violate” this totalitarian decree, there is no freedom of speech or press in Europe.